![]() |
|
|||||||
| Portal MT5 | Register | Projects | FAQ | Forum Rules | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Guys, please try and give feedback. Thanks... |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
i have EA i got, when i test it it make profit, from 12 trade 1 lost and 11 win, it is very seldom open trade perdays only 2 trade and sometime it is not trade, so we have to wait the EA make trade, it is only funtionaly to GBPUSD, stop lost 140 pips, take profit 1 = 50, take profit 2 = 100 pips with trailing stop 15 pips.....
i dont like used it, especially when i at home, but if i work i used it... the accuracy is 90%.
__________________
Thanks Would Be Enough
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
There is always light in darkness ----------------------------------------- Uraha Sura Forex |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
if it is commercial just provide us a name, we will just search its official website... Thanks in advance... |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
This is backtest result (from June 1st to August 1st 2010) of an old EA i made last year, started with $1000 and ended with $11770 with max drawdown 23.71%
I hope it will be this good when i forward test it this month (or may be next month, when i had the time)
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
When viewed from the image seem based on basket trading because of the equity above the balance. The results are very promising. But if I see in the picture, modeling quality of the backtest is only 65.57%. What good is supposed to be 90%. By the way good luck for your forward test
__________________
There is always light in darkness ----------------------------------------- Uraha Sura Forex |
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
i have EA with stop loss 250 pips, but you can see the line....never loss EA, even can beat the paid EA.......i called my EA PAIN........this is for personal use only........ you can see the line...so beautifull......
__________________
Thanks Would Be Enough
|
|
#19
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And it seems that the EA is very sensitive with spikes(since the SL is small), when i test it on other brokers(InstaForex and LiteForex) their performance was bad. I made that test with AdmiralMarkets because they also have demo contest. and after i tweak it further the EA can even turns $1000 into 1 Million in less than 2 month LOL, but since it*s very sensitive with spikes might not be so profitable in reality ![]() Anyway, the forward test on LiteForex wasn*t good, as expected ^_^ that*s why i postpone my forward test on InstaForex, may be i should test it on AdmiralMarkets first @ryc_warlock: i can make my EA to have that smooth line also if i use large SL ![]() The base code of my EA is quite complex, it can even be profitable without using any indicator or signal, i can just set an initial order randomly sell or buy and the EA will open the next orders to make the overall floating orders profitable. |
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
|
Looks like both ryc_warloc and Addamz*s EA are based on martingale. Especially Addamz*s EA based on random order at first order, then next order have lot multiplied.
@ ryc_warlock and Addamz : - If I may know how much relative drawdown ? - If I am permitted, I help you backtest to have a 90% modeling quality. Request mode ON
__________________
There is always light in darkness ----------------------------------------- Uraha Sura Forex |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|